Legal Opinion

Stroud v. Commissioners of Union Drainage District No. 1

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 18, 1910No. Gen. No. 5343PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Mandamus. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Whiteside county; the Hon. Frank D. Ramsay, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibell

Appellees filed a petition in the court below for a mandamus to compel the commissioners of Union Drainage District No. 1 of the township of Hamilton in Lee county and of the township of Hahnaman in the county of Whiteside to erect a bridge across their drainage ditch to connect the enclosed and tilled land of the petitioners on one side of their ditch with their enclosed and tilled land on the other side of the same ditch, as provided by section 14 of the Farm Drainage Act, under which said District is organized, which is as follows: “There shall be constructed at least one bridge or proper…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Hemstreet v. CrabbIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Commissioners of Lake Fork Special Drainage District v. BiggsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  3. People ex rel. Biggs v. Commissioners of Lake Fork Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Riegel v. CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API