Legal Opinion
Hudson Transit Lines, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 9, 1979PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, the order of the New York State Human Rights Appeal Board reinstated, and the cross motion for enforcement granted, with costs.
The State division made findings that the complainant, Eugene Dawson, and his wife are American Indians, clearly recognizable as such, with copper-colored skin and coarse black hair. On August 22, 1975 each was wearing an Indian headband and Mrs. Dawson also had Indian ornaments woven into her braided hair. They had purchased round trip tickets and were waiting to board petitioner’s…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by9 opinions
- Imperial Diner, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- State Office of Drug Abuse Services v. State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- New York Ex Rel. Abrams v. Ocean Club, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Sidoti v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Totem Taxi, Inc. v. New York State Human Rights Appeal BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.