Legal Opinion

Agamian v. Ashcroft

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 14, 2002No. 01-71536; INS No. A27-007-763Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Aram Agamian petitions for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge’s denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a) and we deny the petition.

The BIA’s determination with respect to denial of asylum must be upheld “if supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(7)(B). In determining Agamian’s eligibility for asylum, the BIA must consider whether he has a “well-founded…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Farid Faham Gamal Ghaly v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Brijmati SINGH, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Santiago Pedro-Mateo v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Hamoudi H. KHOURASSANY; Hashem H. Khourassany; Fetam Khourassany, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API