Legal Opinion

Giano v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Although the legal issues petitioner raises could have been decided by Supreme Court in the first instance, we may properly retain jurisdiction and decide the case on the merits (see, Matter of Portugal v Webb, 91 AD2d 997, 998). There is no merit to petitioner’s claim that the hearing to determine whether he was properly confined in administrative segregation was untimely commenced. There is no time limit prescribed by law *987for such a hearing (see, Matter of Young v Coughlin, 144 AD2d 753, Iv dismissed 74 NY2d 625, rearg…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Young v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Portugal v. WebbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StraubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Pabon v. PhillipsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Eastman v. MaloneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API