Legal Opinion

Byrd v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1924No. 15446Published

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. Granting (but not deciding) that the evidence the admission of which is complained of in the 4th ground of the motion for a new trial should have been excluded, the error was harmless, as practically the same evidence from the same witness was admitted without objection. Payne v. Simmons, 27 Ga. App. 506 (2) (109 S. E. 168).

2. For no reason assigned did the court err in admitting the evidence of which complaint is made in the 5th ground.

3. Ground 6 alleges that the court erred in admitting the evidence of J. W. Cowart as to the execution of a certain contract. It was not error to admit…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. McDanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Payne v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  3. Lowe v. WarbingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API