Legal Opinion
Malcom v. Houston
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 26, 2008No. 07-1157PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
Arven Maleom, Jr., was convicted of first degree sexual assault in 1993. After exhausting his state appeals, he filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He sought relief based on the alleged denial of his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of trial and appellate counsel and to conflict-free representation. The district court 1 denied relief on all claims and Maleom appealed. We granted a certificate of appealability on the question whether it was error to analyze Malcom’s ineffective assistance of trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Florida v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Vernon Brown v. Allen D. LuebbersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Barnett v. RoperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Paul v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Hunt v. HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- State v. JedlickaNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Forsyth v. AultCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.