Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Eleuteri v. Richman

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 26, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

43 N.J. Super. 303 (1956)

128 A.2d 743

HARRY ELEUTERI AND EDWARD DANLEY, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

GROVER C. RICHMAN, JR., ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, AND MARTIN J. QUEENAN, COUNTY PROSECUTOR OF BURLINGTON COUNTY, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided December 26, 1956.

Mr. James M. Davis, Jr. (Messrs. Powell & Davis), attorney for plaintiffs.

Mr. Stanley Cohen, Deputy Attorney-General, attorney for defendants.

HANEMAN, J.S.C.

Defendant Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney-General of New Jersey, has moved for a summary judgment on the pleadings. For the purpose of this motion, the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. People v. DeforeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Stefanelli v. MinardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Youngbey v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. Eleuteri v. RichmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. Shew v. JeffersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. Youngbey v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API