Legal Opinion
Doe v. Maher
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 11, 1986No. Nos. 83-2613, 84-1984 and 84-2080PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
The California Superintendent of Public Instruction (State Superintendent), the San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD), the Superintendent of the SFUSD, and various other school officials appeal the expansive declaratory judgments rendered, and the injunctions imposed, by the district court pursuant to the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1401-1461 (1982), and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (section 504), 29 U.S.C. § 794 (1982), in favor of appellees John Doe and Jack Smith, two emotionally handicapped students.1 Doe and Smith…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dellmuth v. MuthSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Christopher W. v. Portsmouth School Committee, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Clyde K. And Sheila K., Individually and as Guardians for Ryan K., a Minor v. Puyallup School District, No. 3, Clyde K. Sheila K. v. Puyallup SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Doe v. MaherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.