R.E. Davis Chemical Corporation, an Illinois Corporation v. Diasonics, Incorporated, a California Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Though uncomplicated on its face, this contract dispute has spawned a protracted cycle of litigation. It presents puzzling questions of first impression regarding the manner in which the hypothetical expenses of a seller, avoided as a result of the buyer’s premature breach, should figure in the lost profits damage calculus.
I
Diasonics is a Delaware 1 corporation engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing medical diagnostic equipment. R.E. Davis Chemical Corporation (Davis), an Illinois business, contracted to purchase one such device, a .35 tesla nuclear…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Teradyne, Inc. v. Teledyne Industries, Inc., Teradyne, Inc. v. Teledyne Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Unique Systems, Inc., and Duane F. Lilja, and Cross-Appellants v. Zotos International, Inc., and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- R.E. Davis Chemical Corp. v. Diasonics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Southwest Forest Industries, Inc. v. Robert SharfsteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Chicago Title Insurance v. MagnusonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Chicago Title Insurance Corporation v. James A. MagnusonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Pampered Chef v. AlexanianDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Gianetti v. Norwalk HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Canusa Corp. v. a & R LOBOSCO, INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.