Legal Opinion

American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Council 79 v. Scott

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided June 13, 2013No. Case No. 11-21976-CIVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING LAW OFFICE OF STABINSKI & FUNT, P.A.’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL AND STRIKING NOTICE AND CLAIM OF ATTORNEY’S CHARGING LIEN

EDWIN G. TORRES, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Stabinski & Funt, P.A.’s (“Stabinski”) Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff [D.E. 112] and Verified Notice and Claim of Attorney’s Charging Lien, [D.E. 113], filed April 25 and 26, 2013. Plaintiff American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Council 79 (“AFSCME”) filed a Response in Opposition, [D.E. 117], on May 2, 2013 to which Stabinski replied on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Peacock v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Sinclair, Etc. & Zavertnik, PA v. BaucomSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  5. Joseph P. Jenkins v. Honorable Zita L. Weinshienk, Judge of the United States District Court for the District of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gomez v. LopezDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2018
  2. Davis v. HallDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2022
  3. FAJARDO v. LAS 3K USA, L.L.C.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2019
  4. Russell Cowles v. Gretchen Hentsch-CowlesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API