Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jesse Hines v. David Miller, Superintendent

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 24, 2003No. 01-2507Published

1DissentWinter, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

At his sentencing hearing, appellant filed a motion to withdraw the plea of guilty he had entered eleven days earlier. The motion was a typical pro se filing, asserting in conclusory terms that he had been coerced by his counsel to enter the plea and was innocent. His counsel declined to aid in the presentation of that motion because of a perceived conflict of interest resulting from the coercion allegation. Counsel requested that new counsel be appointed to present the motion “on proper papers” and proffer “additional information that the defendant may wish to impart…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API