Legal Opinion

Luboyeski v. Hill

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1994No. 20909PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MONTGOMERY, Chief Justice.

This case involves, primarily, the question whether the New Mexico Tort Claims Act overrides or supersedes the New Mexico Human Rights Act, so as to shield a governmental entity from liability that would otherwise flow from a discriminatory practice proscribed by the latter Act. We hold that it does not.

The case arises from an appeal by Lynn Luboyeski from a determination of “no probable cause” by the Human Rights Division of the New Mexico Department of Labor (“the Division”). In the appeal she named as defendants not only the Santa Fe Public School System…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hicks v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Begay v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Quintana v. New Mexico Department of CorrectionsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Smialek v. BegayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Mitchell-Carr v. McLendonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Lymon v. Aramark Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
  3. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Sonntag v. ShawNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Gandy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API