Legal Opinion

Sinkiewicz v. Lee & Cady

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1931No. Docket No. 6, Calendar No. 35,213PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

In behalf of herself and minor children, the plaintiff presented a claim for compensation against Lee & Cady for injuries resulting in the death of her husband, Tony .Sinkiewicz, while in its employ. To review an order awarding compensation, the defendants have brought certiorari.

Briefly stated, the facts show that on January 11, 1930, Tony Sinkiewicz was working for Lee & Cady as a laborer. His duties required him to pick up sacks and cases of sugar from the floor and place them on a truck. The sacks weighed 100 pounds and the cases 60. He was working alone when he received his injuries. His…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kutschmar v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Stombaugh v. Peerless Wire Fence Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Delille v. Holton-Seelye Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Giguere v. E. B. & A. C. Whiting Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1935
  3. Marlowe v. Huron Mountain ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Williams v. National Cash Register Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Waites v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API