State v. Rugan
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from, St. Louis Court of Appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Sherwood, C. J. —
1. witness: praehce, onmmai.
Defendant was indicted for, and convicted of, an assault with intent to kill, and appealed to the coul’t appeals, where the judgment being reversed, the State appeals here. The case of the State v. Clinton, 67 Mo. 380, settled the point that under the recent statute, a defendant who offers himself as a witness occupies the same footing as any other witness, and is, therefore, subject to the same rules and tests. For this reason the defendant having answered on examination in chief that the scar on his forehead ivas produced by the prosecuting…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. ClintonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. SaundersOregon Supreme Court · 1886
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- State v. PorterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- State v. McGrawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- State v. DouglassSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.