Legal Opinion
Harris v. Britton
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 30, 1954No. Nos. 11893, 11996, 12032, 12131PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDGERTON, Circuit Judge.
These are workmen’s compensation cases. Briscoe was injured driving a truck. The deputy commissioner awarded compensation based on findings that Harris was Briscoe’s general employer and Maloney Concrete Company, Inc., his special employer.
Harris, the Maloney Company, and the Company’s insurance carrier have appealed from several judgments of the District Court (1) dismissing suits to set aside the basic award;1 (2) dismissing a suit to set aside a supplementary order of the deputy commissioner declaring the amount in default;2 and (3) requiring payment to Briscoe of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Twine v. LockeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Harris v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
3Cited by2 opinions
- Oliver Cassell v. Earl C. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Theodore J. Harris, Maloney Concrete Company, Inc., a Corporation, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., a Corporation v. Theodore Britton, Deputy Commissioner, District of Columbia Compensation District, Bureau of Employees' Compensation, United States Department of Labor, Louis M. Briscoe, (Three Cases). Theodore J. Harris, Maloney Concrete Company, Inc., a Corporation, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., a Corporation v. Louis M. BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954