Sherrick v. Landstrom

The defendant appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action for damages arising out of an automobile accident. The only question in this appeal is whether the plaintiff’s attorney improperly injected the matter of liability insurance into .the case.

The appellant’s brief does not contain an assignment of error. It merely sets out certain matters designated as propositions of law. Rule 19 of the Rules of Procedure of the Oregon Supreme Court (see 222 Or [15] reads as follows:

“Each assignment of error shall be clearly and succinctly stated under separate and appropriate headings. Where…