Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 13, 1940No. 13270PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

1. The evidence being in conflict on the material issues, it does not appear that the award of temporary alimony and attorney’s fees involved an abuse of the discretion of the judge. Code, § 30-205; Pearson v. Pearson, 125 Ga. 132 (54 S. E. 194); George v. George, 130 Ga. 608 (61 S. E. 401) ; Brown v. Brown, 159 Ga. 323 (125 S. E. 713); Rigdon v. Rigdon, 174 Ga. 903 (164 S. E. 677) ; Burkhalter v. Burkhalter, 189 Ga. 344 (6 S. E. 2d, 290).

2. Under the pleadings and the evidence the court did not err in continuing in force the writ of ne exeat and the bond given thereunder. See…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carnes v. CarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Salter v. Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Lomax v. LomaxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  4. May v. MaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  5. Pearson v. PearsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burger v. BurgerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API