Legal Opinion

Brothers v. Scott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 3, 1981PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously modified, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Striking pleadings for failure to comply with an order directing submission to an examination before trial is a severe penalty which should be imposed only when failure to comply has been willful or contumacious. Since it is impossible to determine whether defendant’s possible failure to comply with the order will be willful, Special Term erred in striking the answer and counterclaim prospectively (see Ortiz v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 72 AD2d 741). The order should…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ortiz v. New York City HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scott v. Lawyers Co-Operative Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Kahre-Richardes Family Foundation, Inc. v. Village of BaldwinsvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API