Legal Opinion

Firestone v. Anthony J. Contello Housing Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1972PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtArthur S. Hirsch, J.

Petitioners, shareholder-lessees of the respondent company (hereinafter referred to as the company or as Contello), a limited-profit co-operative operating a Mitchell-Lama housing project pursuant to article II of the Private Housing Finance Law (PHFL), instituted this article 78 proceeding to compel the company, among other things, to turn over the full price of the sale ’ ’ of petitioners ’ stock.

In other words, petitioners are contesting the company’s asserted legal obligation to impose a surcharge upon petitioners’ carrying charges for the years 1970, 1971, and for that part of the year…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Strycker's Bay Apartments, Inc. v. WalshNew York Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Leland House, Inc. v. AntarCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API