Kent v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action for damages. Before Judge Littlejohn. Macon superior court. July 10,1914.
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, P. J.
1. Where complaint is made in a motion for a new trial that a named witness for the plaintiff was not permitted to testify to certain facts, and in the brief of evidence it appears that the witness did testify to such facts, and both the motion for a new trial and the brief of evidence are duly approved by the presiding judge, this court can not hold that the brief of evidence is incorrect, but must reconcile the two statements on the theory, that, while at one time the court made the ruling stated in the motion for a new trial, at some stage of the examination the testimony was admitted.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Roberts v. TiftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Gilleland & Dillingham v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Southern Railway Co. v. TollersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Morris v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. PriddyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Peek v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Rozier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.