Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Daniel International Corp.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 19, 1979No. 21008PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice.

The issue is whether the respondent, Lonnie Hamilton, a work release prisoner employed by appellant Daniel International Corporation, is eligible for workmen’s compensation. The single commissioner, the full commission and the trial court all concluded respondent was entitled to' benefits. We affirm.

Hamilton was injured on a Daniel International job site while participating in the prison work release program. He was permitted to enter into a voluntary contract of employment with Daniel, and enjoyed the same salary and working conditions as other Daniel employees. Hamilton lived…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cooper v. McDevitt & Street Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  2. Tharpe v. G. E. Moore Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1970

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Benavidez v. Sierra Blanca MotorsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Davis v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Timmy Vuncannon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  4. City of South Tucson v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  5. Sellers v. Daniel Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API