Legal Opinion
State v. Oropeza
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided January 12, 1976No. 11542Published
1Opinion of the Court
545 P.2d 475 (1976)
97 Idaho 387
STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Jose Luis OROPEZA and Gail Ann Oropeza, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 11542.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
January 12, 1976.
Richard S. Udell of Derr, Derr, Walters & Cantrill, Boise, for defendants-appellants.
W. Anthony Park, Atty. Gen., Lynn Thomas, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.
McQUADE, Chief Justice.
Defendants-appellants Jose Luis Oropeza and Gail Ann Oropeza were found guilty of unlawful possession of a controlled substance (heroin) in violation of I.C. § 37-2732(c)(1) after a jury trial. We reverse the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.