Doyle v. Doyle
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel H. Hofstadter, J.
Motion to resettle order of December 4, 1956, is granted to the extent of making the increase of the weekly alimony effective from and as of July 1, 1956. The *5defendant husband’s conduct hardly commends itself. His default, however, on the original settlement of the order was due to no fault on his part, and, in the circumstances, the same disposition should now be made which would have been made had the defendant not defaulted in the settlement.
The foregoing constitutes the decision of the court in the instant application. I cannot, however, leave the matter here. This action is a classic…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Kover v. KoverNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Conner v. ConnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Phillips v. PhillipsNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Laws v. LawsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Brownstein v. BrownsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.