Gunn v. Knoop, Freirichs & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Title. Contracts. Sales. Delivery. Cotton. Factors. Before Judge Simmons. Bibb Superior Court. October Term, 1883. To the report contained in the decision, it is-only necessary to add that the j ury found for the defendants, and a motion for a new trial having been overruled, plaintiff excepted.
1Opinion of the Court
Blandford, Justice.
This was an action by plaintiff in error to recover of defendants in error the value of nine bales of cotton.
It appears that the factor of Gunn agreed to sell the cotton to the agent of Kno.op, Freirichs & Co. The cotton was weighed and price agreed upon; it was to be a cash sale-The cotton was to remain in the warehouse of plaintiff’s factor until the next morning, when it was to be. paid for and turned out for shipment- A bill containing the cotton, with its price, was handed defendant, upon which he endorsed "O. K.,” and signed his name. Before the time arrived for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sparrow v. Pate & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1880
- Groover, Stubbs & Co. v. Warfield & WayneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
3Cited by9 opinions
- Flannery v. HarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Randle v. Stone & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Daniel v. HannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Livingston v. Anderson & SonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Mountain City Mill Co. v. ButlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.