State v. Gavins
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
As all parties to this appeal concede that the trial judge did not enter a written order setting forth the reasons for entering a sentence departing from the sentencing guidelines, we remand for entry of the required written order. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)11; State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054, 1055 (Fla.1985) (“We approve that part of the district court’s decision directing a written order expressing reasons for departure.... ”); * accord State v. Oden, 478 So.2d 51 (Fla.1985), aff'g 463 So.2d 313, 314 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). While the trial court’s oral reasons might be supportable under Barbera…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Barbera v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Wilkerson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Oden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990