Legal Opinion

Beatty v. Lamont

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 6, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00380Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT TERESA BEATTY et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 3:22-cv-380 (JAM) WILLIAM TONG, Attorney General, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS Connecticut is one of many States that have what is known as a prisoner “pay to stay” law. The law creates a claim that the State may enforce against a prisoner for some or all of the costs of imprisonment. See

Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 18

-85a to -85c.1 Pay-to-stay laws have proved controversial. On the one hand, proponents argue that they appropriately shift the costs of imprisonment to criminals who have chosen…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  5. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API