Legal Opinion

Rogers v. M.O. Bitner Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1987No. 19224PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

M.O. Bitner Company (Bitner Company) appeals from a district court decision holding it liable to William and Patricia Rogers and Harold H. Bennett (Rogers and Bennett). The Rogers and Bennett claims are factually discrete and will be treated separately. An issue concerning the trial court’s denial of a mistrial motion purportedly made by Bitner Company on the basis of a conflict of interest is common to both the Bennett’s and Rogers’ claims and will be treated in the final section of this opinion.

Bitner Company owned a plot of land near Park City that it desired to sell as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. ClaytonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Toomer's Estate v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Lignell v. BergUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Kemp v. MurrayUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Bassett v. BakerUtah Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ditty v. Checkrite, Ltd., Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1997
  2. IFG Leasing Co. v. GordonUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Ellsworth Paulsen Construction Co. v. 51-SPR-L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Mardanlou v. GhaffarianCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
  5. Ellsworth Paulsen Construction Co. v. 51-SPR, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API