Laffoon v. Bell & Zoller Coal Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Dissent
Mr. JUSTICE GEORGE J. MORAN,
dissenting:
I do not agree that plaintiff is an employee of Bell & Zoller so as to preclude him from suing under the Structural Work Act (Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 48, par. 60 ets eq.). In the recent case of M & M Electric Co. v. Industrial Com., 57 Ill.2d 113, our supreme court reiterated the established principle of law that a contract of employment cannot exist without the consent of both parties, saying at page 119:
“It is not possible for a contract of employment to exist without the consent of the parties, and as pointed out by this court in McHugh-Brighton v.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Reed v. the YakaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Larson v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Grasse v. Dealer's Transport Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Gannon v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
- Industrial Comm'n of Wis. v. McCartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.