Legal Opinion · Dissent

McGinnis v. Enslow

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1954No. 10635Published

1Dissent

Given, President,

dissenting:

Since the majority opinion concedes that appellee is not a bona fide purchaser for value, in that he had not paid the agreed purchase price at the time he acquired knowledge of the rights of appellants, this dissent goes only to the question of whether there was created a valid agreement between Mrs. Enslow and the Foster Foundation. *111It is my view that there was a valid offer made by Mrs. Enslow, and that the offer was duly accepted by the Foster Foundation before any rights of appellee accrued. The majority concedes, as I understand the opinion, that the judgment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shrewsbury v. TuftsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Wood & Brooks Co. v. D. E. Hewit Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Hallauer v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Parks v. Morris, Layfield & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Morgan-Gardner Electric Co. v. Beelick Knob Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API