Legal Opinion

Joey Herren v. Gregory Paul Sucher

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 6, 2013No. A13A1076Published

1Opinion of the Court

THIRD DIVISION ANDREWS, P. J., DILLARD and MCMILLIAN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/ November 6, 2013 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A13A1076. HERREN et al. v. SUCHER et al. A13A1117. HERREN et al. v. BARRIN INNOVATIONS, LLC. MCMILLIAN, Judge. After suffering a stroke following an exercise session with a personal trainer at a gym, plaintiff/appellant Joey Herren filed a complaint, as several times amended and recast, seeking damages…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Holmes v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. McEver v. Planners & Engineers Collaborative, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. My Fair Lady of Georgia, Inc. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Lovelace v. Figure Salon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Johnson-Battle Lumber Co. v. Emanuel Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API