Legal Opinion
Fox Weeks v. Laney
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 27, 1917No. 9695PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Before Wirson, J., Anderson, Spring term, 1917. Action by Fox & Weeks against Mrs. Alice M. Laney. From judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal. submits: Charge was misleading and not applicable to case: Bashfield Instructions to Juries, pp. 182, 194; 60 S. C. 9; 57 S. C. 280; 102 S. C. 57; 78 S. C. 537; 58 S. C. 247. Original promise: 9 Cyc. B. 666. Consideration:9 Cyc., pp. 310, 311, 315; 3 Parsons Contracts 24; 29 S. C. 9. Charge misleading: 102 S. C. 413.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. ChieE Justice Gary.
This is an action upon an account, and the allegations of the complaint are as follows :
“(1) The plaintiffs herein respectfully show to the Court that they comprise a partnership doing business as funeral directors and embalmers in the city of Savannah, Chatham county,- Ga.; that the defendant, Mrs. Alice M. Laney, is the wife of C. D. Laney, and resides with him in the county of Anderson, in the State aforesaid.
“(2) That heretofore, to -wit, on the 23d day of March, 1916, and on the 24th of March, 1916, respectively, • at her…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lorick & Lowrance v. CaldwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- Davis v. BlumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stackhouse v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935