Legal Opinion

United States v. Dixon

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 28, 1993No. 91-1231PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Judgment of the CourtJustice Scalia

In both of these cases, respondents were tried for criminal contempt of court for violating court orders that prohibited them from engaging in conduct that was later the subject of a criminal prosecution. We consider whether the subsequent criminal prosecutions are barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause.

I

Respondent Alvin Dixon was arrested for second-degree murder and was released on bond. Consistent with the District of Columbia’s bail law authorizing the judicial officer to impose any condition that “will reasonably assure the appearance of the person for trial or the safety of any other…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. BURNS v. SEAWORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. BURNS v. SEAWORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. In the Matter of Aries Marine CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2023
  5. MPower Inc v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API