Legal Opinion

McGlinchy v. Bowles

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 9, 1904No. 12,889PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Anderson district court; C. A. Smaet,. judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

Thomas Bowles recovered a judgment-against John McGlinchy upon his liability as a stockholder of the Bank of Garnett in the form of an order allowing execution against him on a judgment against *191the bank. Defendant in this proceeding seeks to reverse the judgment upon two grounds : (1) That he was not in fact such a stockholder; (2) that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. It will be necessary to consider only the second contention. The case was tried on an agreed statement of facts. The bank ceased to do business October 19,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woodworth v. BowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  2. Daly v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. BagleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Seaton v. G. C. Hixon & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  5. Cottrell v. ManloveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Remington Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. O'Neil v. EpplerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Anderson v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  4. Ryno v. SniderWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Abernathy v. LoftusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API