Legal Opinion

Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Public Service Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 6, 1986Published

1Opinion of the CourtMikoll, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which, inter alia, ordered petitioner to refund excessive fuel adjustment charges.

In an opinion issued September 19, 1983, respondent con-*909eluded that, based upon hearing evidence, petitioner had been imprudent in certain of its decisions and practices in the past and that the cost of this imprudence had been passed on to petitioner’s customers through rate adjustments made under fuel adjustment clauses (FACs).…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Kovarsky v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Bates v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Service Commission of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Matter of Village of Boonville v. MaltbieNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API