Legal Opinion

Shechter v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 5, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paviola A. Soto, J), entered June 22, 2004, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted motions by defendants Empire City Subway Company and Petrocelli Electric Co. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny Petrocelli’s motion, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

An issue of fact exists as to whether Petrocelli created the hole in the street that allegedly caused plaintiffs fall (see Field v City of New York, 302 AD2d 223 [2003]). Petrocelli places undue reliance on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Field v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Pignatoro v. CoenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Corprew v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Corprew v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Reyes v. 45 & 47 Wadsworth Ave. Co., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
  4. Ruffin v. Chase Manhattan BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API