Succession of Loeb
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
REDMANN, Judge.
Opponents appeal from a judgment upholding the validity of a statutory will, La. R.S. 9:2442. An attestation following the testator’s first “signature” (an “X”) does not explain the testator’s having signed with a mark. Before that first signature, however, the typewritten will does recite, after all dispositive clauses, “Because I am partially paralyzed and physically weak, but of sound mind and having all my mental capabilities, my signature may be shaky and illegible, I therefore make my mark.”1
The question is whether the statute requires this declaration to follow rather…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Succession of MorganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
- Succession of PorcheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Succession of EckSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- Succession of BelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
- Succession of DugasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Succession of LoebSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982