Legal Opinion

Succession of Loeb

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1982No. 12713PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

REDMANN, Judge.

Opponents appeal from a judgment upholding the validity of a statutory will, La. R.S. 9:2442. An attestation following the testator’s first “signature” (an “X”) does not explain the testator’s having signed with a mark. Before that first signature, however, the typewritten will does recite, after all dispositive clauses, “Because I am partially paralyzed and physically weak, but of sound mind and having all my mental capabilities, my signature may be shaky and illegible, I therefore make my mark.”1

The question is whether the statute requires this declaration to follow rather…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Succession of MorganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
  2. Succession of PorcheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  3. Succession of EckSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  4. Succession of BelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Succession of DugasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Succession of LoebSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API