Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Barnes

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 15, 2014No. Appellate Case No. 2010-178247; No. 27322Published

1DissentChief Justice Toal

I respectfully dissent. I would affirm Appellant’s conviction and sentence.

ISSUES PRESENTED

I. Whether the trial court erred in denying Appellant’s pre-trial request to represent himself pursuant to Faretta v. California.

*38II. Whether the trial court violated Appellant’s Due Process rights by relying on the pre-trial testimony of a doctor retained by Appellant’s defense counsel in anticipation of exclusive use during the trial’s mitigation phase.

III. Wfiiether the trial court erred by limiting Appellant’s trial counsel’s voir dire regarding the views of potential jurors regarding the death…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API