Coppler v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Alfalfa county of grand larceny, and was sentenced to serve a term of two years in the state penitentiary. The only contention made is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment. Defendant was charged with the larceny of 79 bushels of wheat of the value of $79, the property of one Prank Porter. The evidence differs from that in most larceny cases, in that the owner of the property at the time of the trial was mentally unbalanced and unable to attend the trial or to' testify. The state…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- State v. Ah ChueyNevada Supreme Court · 1879
- George v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
- State v. StanleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- McCulloch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- State v. SmallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- Capshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- McCarron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
- Cagle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.