Legal Opinion

Hill ex rel. Hill v. Woodson

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 11, 1989No. 70742Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANSEN, Presiding Judge:

The only issue involved in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting a new trial to Plaintiff. We hold that it did not.

Appellee Janice Hill on behalf of her daughter, Shonna, filed this action against Dr. Joe B. Woodson, D.D.S., and an unnamed employee alleging they assaulted and battered Shonna or were grossly negligent in their treatment of her during a visit to Dr. Woodson’s dental office.1 The jury returned a verdict for Defendants.

Plaintiff filed a timely motion for new trial alleging, among other things, that the trial court erred…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bradley Chevrolet, Inc. v. GoodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  2. Fitts v. Standard Life & Accident Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  3. Williams v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API