Legal Opinion

In Re: Arunachalam

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 27, 2016No. 2016-1560PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HUGHES, Circuit Judge.

Dr. Lakshmi Arunaehalam owns U.S. Patent No. 5,778,178, which has been undergoing reexamination since November 2008. In September 2014, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board affirmed the rejection of claims 9-16, but designated a new ground of rejection for claim 16. Dr. Arunaehalam elected to reopen prosecution of the claims, after which the examiner issued a final rejection in June 2015. Rather than appeal the examiner’s final rejection to the Board, Dr. Arunaehalam filed the instant appeal. Because we lack jurisdiction to consider non-final appeals from the Patent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Copelands' Enterprises, Inc. D/B/A Copelands' Sports v. Cnv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  3. Loughlin v. LingCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. PGS GEOPHYSICAL AS v. IANCUCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  2. Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  3. Bennett Regulator Guards, Inc. v. Atlanta Gas Light CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  4. Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  5. Bennett Regulator Guards, Inc. v. Atlanta Gas Light CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API