Legal Opinion

People v. Byrdsong

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David Goldstein, J.

This is a motion by defendant, appearing pro se, for an *233order pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (h), vacating the judgment of conviction, upon the alleged deprivation of his legal and constitutional rights as a result of the trial court (Groh, J.) having proceeded with a Sandoval hearing prior to trial in defendant’s absence.

This indictment, which charged defendant with robbery in the first degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, attempted rape in the first degree, attempted sodomy in the first degree and assault in the first degree, was tried…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. RoblesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. PetersonNew York Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API