Legal Opinion

King v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1990No. 12S00-8612-CR-1063PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeBRULER, Justice.

Following a jury trial, appellant, Robert Houston King, was convicted of child molesting, LC. 85-42-4-8(a), a Class B felony, and child molesting, 1.C. 85-42-4-8(c), a Class C felony. Appellant received sentences of twelve years and six years respectively with the sentences to be served concurrently. Appellant now brings this direct appeal asserting that his convictions must be reversed because there was insufficient evidence that the alleged offenses took place within a period not barred by the statute of limitations. Appellant further maintains that his convictions must be…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Glover v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Indianapolis Newspapers, Inc. v. FIELDSIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Fair v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Spangler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Angleton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Young v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Dumes v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Ellis Thomas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API