Legal Opinion

In re Friedlin

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 7, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

The relief sought on this motion is for an order vacating a restraining order obtained by the bankrupt ex parte on September 29, 1937.

In September, 1934, the bankrupt, William Friedlin, also known as Will Friedlin, and one Phillip Segal, applied to the American Bonding Company of Baltimore, the judgment creditor herein, for a bond, the purpose of which was to support an application to the state of New York for a liquor license. The license was ’granted, but was thereafter revoked for violating the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, Consol.Laws, c. 3-B. The state of New…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CasalinoNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  2. In re Bessemer Materials, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API