Legal Opinion

Johann Maria Farina Gegenüber Dem Jülichs-Platz v. Chesebrough-Pond, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 29, 1972No. Patent Appeal No. 8779PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, abstracted at 164 USPQ 402 (1969), dismissing appellant’s opposition to registration of this combined mark of appellee:

1- Application serial number 280,017, filed September 11,1967.

2- Registration number 789,454, May 11, 1965.

3- Registration number 247,552, October 2, 1928, renewed.

4- Registration number 791,539, June 22, 1965.

Opposition is predicated on the contention that the design portion of the above mark is likely to cause confusion with any one of these marks of appellant:

Neith…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Application of Burndy CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  2. Owens-Illinois Glass Company v. Clevite CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  3. In the Matter of the Application of Anderson Electric CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grandpa Pidgeon's of Missouri, Inc. v. BorgsmillerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. FabFitFun, Inc., Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2018
  3. Mini Melts, Inc. v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2016
  4. Solid State Design Incorporated, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API