Foutz v. Great Central Insurance Co.

I am unable to read this controverted record as favorably to the appellees as the majority. There is a factual dispute in this record concerning the misrepresentation and fraud count against Crawford: whether Crawford’s investigator, McCamie, falsely told Crucet and Foutz that they had to have invoices for all goods lost, and that the insurance company would not pay for lost goods purchased with cash. This was apparently not a requirement of Great Central. Relying on this false information, Crucet and Foutz prepared and submitted invoices for items they purchased for cash, and they allegedly…