Legal Opinion

Blankenburg v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 25, 2005No. 03-16667Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Nicholas Blankenburg appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the United States, which was based on the Federal Tort Claims Act’s discretionary function exception, 28 U.S.C. § 2680(a). For the exception to apply, the government must prove that (1) the challenged conduct involves an element of judgment or choice; and (2) the judgment or choice is the type the discretionary function exception was designed to shield, see Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531, 536-37, 108 S.Ct. 1954, 100 L.Ed.2d 531 (1988), that is, one based on “social, economic, or political…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Lorrin Whisnant, Individually v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Felix Valdez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Kendra Summers, a Minor, and Frederick J. Summers, Guardian Ad Litem v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API