Blankenburg v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Nicholas Blankenburg appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the United States, which was based on the Federal Tort Claims Act’s discretionary function exception, 28 U.S.C. § 2680(a). For the exception to apply, the government must prove that (1) the challenged conduct involves an element of judgment or choice; and (2) the judgment or choice is the type the discretionary function exception was designed to shield, see Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531, 536-37, 108 S.Ct. 1954, 100 L.Ed.2d 531 (1988), that is, one based on “social, economic, or political…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lorrin Whisnant, Individually v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Felix Valdez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Kendra Summers, a Minor, and Frederick J. Summers, Guardian Ad Litem v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.