Legal Opinion

Ravenscroft v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 23, 2003No. 1D01-4340Published

1Per curiam

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to withdraw his nolo con-tendere plea. As to appellant’s claim that his sentence includes special conditions of probation not orally pronounced at sentencing, this issue is not preserved for appeal. See Harvey v. State, 786 So.2d 28, 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (holding that “no unpreserved sentencing errors will be entertained on appeal if the defendant had available to him the procedural mechanism of the most recent amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)”), review granted by 797 So.2d 585 (Fla.2001); see also Fillyaw v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harvey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Fillyaw v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API