Kessler v. Zink

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Case, Chief Justice.

This is .an appeal from a judgment in the Supreme Court sustaining respondent’s demurrer to an alternative writ of mandamus which sought to compel the payment of pension benefits under R. S. 43 :4-2, et seq. We find no opinion of the Supreme Court, but the briefs make clear that the demurrer was sustained for the reason that the relator below — appellant here — was not shown to have attained the age of sixty-two years.

On November 1st, 1920, appellant became Director of the New Jersey Eehabilitation Clinic in the Department of Labor.…