Green v. Shute
City of New York Municipal Court
Appeal from trial term. Action by Shirley J. Green against üSToah B. Shute, impleaded with others.
1Per curiam 1
The case presented a disputed question of fact, and either party had the right to require its submission to the jury, who "might have decided the question submitted for plaintiff or defendant. Each side, however, requested a direction of a verdict in his favor, and neither can complain now that a direction was improper. Strong v. Manufacturing Co., 6 Hun, 528; Leggett v. Hyde, 58 N. Y. 275; Koehler v. Adler, 78 N. Y. 287; Ormes v. Dauchy, 82 N. Y. 443; Dillon v. Cockcroft, 90 N. Y. 649. If the jury had voluntarily rendered the verdict the trial judge directed, it would have been regarded as…
Also in this document: Per curiam 2.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Koehler v. . AdlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Dillon v. . CockcroftNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Ormes v. . DauchyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Grossman v. Supreme Lodge of Knights & Ladies of HonorNew York Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by4 opinions
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. MulkeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Sire v. RumboldCity of New York Municipal Court · 1890
- Balz v. ShawCity of New York Municipal Court · 1895
- Goldenson v. LawrenceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1892