Day v. New England Car-Spring Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for New York
[This was an. action at law by Horace H. Day against the New England Car-Spring Company for an injunction of the alleged in- • fringement of a patent. A motion to strike out the special pleas filed by defendants was heretofore denied. Case No. 3,6S7.]
1Opinion of the Court
BETTS, District Judge.
On the trial of the above cause in this court at the last term, points of law as to the admissibility and competency of parol evidence were raised, and, after a labored discussion by counsel, were decided by the court adversely to objections taken by the defendants’ counsel. The court at the timo stated orally its views of the law applicable to the case, but intimated that, because of the earnestness and confidence with which the objections to the testimony had been urged, the reasons governing the decision, with a reference to authorities supposed to support it, would…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Root v. FrenchNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Sandford v. HandyNew York Supreme Court · 1840
- Jackson ex. rel. Cadwell v. KingNew York Supreme Court · 1825
- Stevens v. CooperNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
- Ferris v. CrawfordNew York Supreme Court · 1845
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.